Investigating the use of psychomotor abilities tests as predictors of training performance in the Canadian Forces technical and mechanical occupations

Abstract

The present study examined the predictive validity of three psychomotor ability measures, manual dexterity, finger dexterity, and motor coordination, on two criteria, training success/failure, and training performance. The incremental validity of three psychomotor ability measures beyond measures of g, were examined in a military sample of Canadian Forces Personnel being trained in technical and mechanical occupations.

Trainees engaged in Qualification Level 3 training (n = 340) completed the three psychomotor ability scales of the General Aptitude Test Battery; archival data were collected from a cognitive measure; the Canadian Forces' General Classification Test Form 3 Revised (n = 332). Training performance criteria were based on knowledge tests and instructor evaluations of student performance on occupation-related performance objectives. Criterion data were letter grades (n = 209), percentage grades (n = 254), and pass/fail indications (n = 301), taken from course evaluation reports.

Analyses were conducted separately for the Technical (n = 98) and Mechanical (n = 242) occupation groups, and for both groups combined (n = 340). (Abstract shortened by UMI.)