Why do committed customers defect? They are not engaged!

Show simple item record

dc.creator Fullerton, Gordon L. (Gordon Lee), 1964-
dc.date.accessioned 2014-02-27T18:55:22Z
dc.date.available 2014-02-27T18:55:22Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.identifier http://library2.smu.ca/bitstream/handle/01/25409/asb_proceedings_2013.pdf#page=301
dc.identifier.uri http://library2.smu.ca/xmlui/handle/01/25721
dc.description.abstract Marketing practitioners and academicians have been talking a lot about customer engagement in recent years (Sprott et.al, 2009; Fournier, 2011). By all accounts it is the newest and hottest “construct” in the field these days (Bolton, 2011). But, what is it? Is it a construct in and of itself? Is it a model or set of relationships? Is it some type of second (or third) order factor that subsumes a number of other constructs in the field? Or is it something else? This paper will focus on the “something else” explanation for customer engagement. Specifically, it will put forward that engagement might be little more than a specific type relationship between commitment and loyalty. en_CA
dc.description.provenance Submitted by Trish Grelot (trish.grelot@smu.ca) on 2014-02-27T18:55:22Z No. of bitstreams: 0 en
dc.description.provenance Made available in DSpace on 2014-02-27T18:55:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2013 en
dc.language.iso en en_CA
dc.publisher Atlantic Schools of Business en_CA
dc.subject.lcsh Customer loyalty
dc.title Why do committed customers defect? They are not engaged! en_CA
dc.type Text en_CA
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Proceedings of the 43rd Atlantic Schools of Business conference, St. Francis Xavier University, 2013, pp 301-310
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record