Dignity at work

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Kelloway, E. Kevin
dc.creator Thibault, Tabatha
dc.date.accessioned 2022-08-11T14:00:48Z
dc.date.available 2022-08-11T14:00:48Z
dc.date.issued 2022-08-02
dc.identifier.uri http://library2.smu.ca/xmlui/handle/01/31003
dc.description 1 online resource (168 pages)
dc.description Includes abstract and appendices.
dc.description Includes bibliographical references (pages 117-130).
dc.description.abstract Workplace dignity has been an emerging topic in psychology in the last decade and is theoretically tied to employee well-being (Khademi et al., 2012; Utriainen & Kyngäs, 2011). However, dignity at work has been difficult to assess due to the lack of a clear definition and the fact that no measure of workplace dignity is available (Lucas et al., 2013). The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a measure of workplace dignity, demonstrate that it is a unique construct, and examine its relationships to pre-established organizational constructs. Based on the current definitions and theorized aspects of dignity at work, a more extensive definition of workplace dignity was offered: Dignity at work involves both self-respect and respect from others, a feeling of worth and value, and a sense of autonomy and control over one’s own behaviour. Study 1 produced a 12-item, four-factor scale where each factor demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency (control; work and value; respect from others; self-respect). Study 2 found that the factor structure roughly held up in a sample of working students and that it predicted employee engagement above and beyond other workplace constructs. Study 3 found that psychological safety longitudinally predicted three of dignity’s dimensions over time (two time lags). Study 4 found that the scale’s factor structure held up over time (three time lags) in a retail sample. Each study examined antecedents (e.g., workload, leadership) and outcomes (e.g., stress) of workplace dignity. Implications for theory and practice are discussed. en_CA
dc.description.provenance Submitted by Greg Hilliard (greg.hilliard@smu.ca) on 2022-08-11T14:00:48Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Thibault_Tabatha_PHD_2022.pdf: 1378681 bytes, checksum: af39a690dde88ee5b92ff9ef505d076c (MD5) en
dc.description.provenance Made available in DSpace on 2022-08-11T14:00:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Thibault_Tabatha_PHD_2022.pdf: 1378681 bytes, checksum: af39a690dde88ee5b92ff9ef505d076c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022-08-02 en
dc.language.iso en en_CA
dc.publisher Halifax, N.S. : Saint Mary's University
dc.subject.lcsh Dignity
dc.subject.lcsh Work -- Psychological aspects
dc.subject.lcsh Quality of work-life
dc.subject.lcsh Well-being
dc.subject.lcsh Leadership
dc.subject.lcsh Psychometrics
dc.title Dignity at work en_CA
dc.title.alternative Dignity at work
dc.type Text en_CA
thesis.degree.name Doctor of Philosophy in Industrial/Organizational Psychology
thesis.degree.level Doctoral
thesis.degree.discipline Psychology
thesis.degree.grantor Saint Mary's University (Halifax, N.S.)
 Find Full text

Files in this item

 
 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record