How well can we measure supermassive black hole spin?

Show simple item record

dc.creator Bonson, K.
dc.creator Gallo, Luigi C.
dc.date.accessioned 2018-01-23T14:51:26Z
dc.date.available 2018-01-23T14:51:26Z
dc.date.issued 2016-05-11
dc.identifier.issn 0035-8711
dc.identifier.uri http://library2.smu.ca/handle/01/27250
dc.description Publisher's Version/PDF
dc.description.abstract Being one of only two fundamental properties black holes possess, the spin of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) is of great interest for understanding accretion processes and galaxy evolution. However, in these early days of spin measurements, consistency and reproducibility of spin constraints have been a challenge. Here, we focus on X-ray spectral modelling of active galactic nuclei (AGN), examining how well we can truly return known reflection parameters such as spin under standard conditions. We have created and fit over 4000 simulated Seyfert 1 spectra each with 375[plus or minus]1k counts. We assess the fits with reflection fraction of R = 1 as well as reflection-dominated AGN with R = 5. We also examine the consequence of permitting fits to search for retrograde spin. In general, we discover that most parameters are overestimated when spectroscopy is restricted to the 2.5–10.0 keV regime and that models are insensitive to inner emissivity index and ionization. When the bandpass is extended out to 70 keV, parameters are more accurately estimated. Repeating the process for R = 5 reduces our ability to measure photon index (∼3 to 8 per cent error and overestimated), but increases precision in all other parameters – most notably ionization, which becomes better constrained ([plus or minus]45 erg cm s[superscript −1]) for low-ionization parameters ([xi] < 200 erg cm s[superscript −1]). In all cases, we find the spin parameter is only well measured for the most rapidly rotating SMBHs (i.e. a > 0.8 to about [plus or minus]0.10) and that inner emissivity index is never well constrained. Allowing our model to search for retrograde spin did not improve the results. en_CA
dc.description.provenance Submitted by Betty McEachern (betty.mceachern@smu.ca) on 2018-01-23T14:51:26Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Bonson_K_article_2016.pdf: 5116059 bytes, checksum: d7e3b3244c5ffce48fed86bf5b8bb3d2 (MD5) en
dc.description.provenance Made available in DSpace on 2018-01-23T14:51:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Bonson_K_article_2016.pdf: 5116059 bytes, checksum: d7e3b3244c5ffce48fed86bf5b8bb3d2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 en
dc.language.iso en en_CA
dc.publisher Oxford University Press en_CA
dc.relation.uri https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw466
dc.rights This article has been accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society ©: 2016 The Authors. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
dc.subject.lcsh Black holes (Astronomy)
dc.subject.lcsh Active galactic nuclei
dc.subject.lcsh X-ray sources, Galactic
dc.subject.lcsh X-ray spectroscopy
dc.title How well can we measure supermassive black hole spin? en_CA
dc.type Text en_CA
dcterms.bibliographicCitation Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 458(2), 1927-1938. (2016) en_CA
 Find Full text

Files in this item


 

Copyright statement:

 
This article has been accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society ©: 2016 The Authors. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
 
Published Version: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw466
 
 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account