The construction of Canadian business schools’ occupational health and safety curriculum

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Helms-Mills, Jean,1954-
dc.creator Fitzgerald, Catherine Anne
dc.date.accessioned 2018-04-25T14:14:31Z
dc.date.available 2018-04-25T14:14:31Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.other HF1134.3 F578 2017
dc.identifier.uri http://library2.smu.ca/handle/01/27447
dc.description 321 leaves : illustrations ; 29 cm
dc.description Includes abstract and appendices.
dc.description Includes bibliographical references (leaves 278-308).
dc.description.abstract This dissertation revisits the socio-historical origins and perspectives of Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) practice and its relationship to OHS studies in Canadian business schools by concentrating on the first Workmen’s Compensation Acts (WCA) in the early 20th century and the first comprehensive OHS Acts that emerged in the early 1970s. It was during these two eras of massive public unrest and openly expressed public fears about health and safety that the largest and most influential OHS regulatory bodies endeavored to provide solutions to the escalating OHS problems in Canada. This resulted in the regulatory agencies attempting to set rules and standards for work-related OHS behaviours and conduct. A critical hermeneutic analysis of five interpretive moments on the legal documents and related publications produced during the planning, passing, and implementation of these legislations, followed by a third analysis of the first Canadian business schools’ OHS curriculum documents that emerged in parallel with the later OHS laws, allow us to see how OHS business practices and studies were shaped. My findings reveal that while many OHS methods of the law makers remained the same, with some being strengthened and others being introduced, the underlying perspectives within these social practices remained unaltered for over a century. The Safety Pays ethos (the belief that it pays for business owners to engage in OHS activities) and the WorkSafe ethos (the belief that it is best for workers to take responsibility for their health and safety) have been woven deep within accepted business practices and studies related to OHS, the former considering OHS mechanisms that make financial sense and dismiss more humane practices that do not, and the latter promoting workers’ behaviour change over organization change. The 100 years of historical conflicts and compromises that resulted in today’s OHS “common-sense” business techniques and teachings can be explained through hegemonic processes. en_CA
dc.description.provenance Submitted by Greg Hilliard (greg.hilliard@smu.ca) on 2018-04-25T14:14:31Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Fitzgerald_Catherine_PHD_2017.pdf: 2570878 bytes, checksum: e180452ae085d5e5ebbc2d3a17ec391c (MD5) en
dc.description.provenance Made available in DSpace on 2018-04-25T14:14:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Fitzgerald_Catherine_PHD_2017.pdf: 2570878 bytes, checksum: e180452ae085d5e5ebbc2d3a17ec391c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-11-17 en
dc.language.iso en en_CA
dc.publisher Halifax, N.S. : Saint Mary's University
dc.subject.lcc HF1134.3
dc.subject.lcsh Business schools -- Curricula -- Canada
dc.subject.lcsh Business education -- Canada
dc.subject.lcsh Safety education, Industrial -- Canada
dc.subject.lcsh Industrial safety -- Law and legislation -- Canada -- History
dc.title The construction of Canadian business schools’ occupational health and safety curriculum en_CA
dc.type Text en_CA
thesis.degree.name Doctor of Philosophy in Business Administration (Management)
thesis.degree.level Doctoral
thesis.degree.discipline Management
thesis.degree.grantor Saint Mary's University (Halifax, N.S.)
 Find Full text

Files in this item

 
 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account