dc.contributor.advisor |
Van Proosdij, Danika, 1969- |
|
dc.coverage.spatial |
Prince Edward Island |
|
dc.creator |
Nelson, Erin |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-04-29T12:54:44Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-04-29T12:54:44Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2022-04-24 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://library2.smu.ca/xmlui/handle/01/30892 |
|
dc.description |
1 online resource (110, 4 unnumbered pages) : colour illustrations, colour maps, charts, graphs |
|
dc.description |
Includes abstract and appendices. |
|
dc.description |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 86-95). |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Coastal erosion rates on Prince Edward Island (PEI) are increasing due to climate change.
Wave action continuously works on the unconsolidated till and sandstone banks, eroding and
receding coastlines, while nourishing beaches and estuaries. This causes intensified risk to
properties, infrastructure, and humans. Hard engineered structures are common, short-term,
solutions to coastal erosion. These structures disrupt the natural land-water interaction as wave
energy is deflected at the structure and dispersed to adjacent areas, increasing erosion. Living
shorelines are used as alternatives to hard structures by incorporating natural materials, such as
vegetation, to provide coastal protection. Living shorelines are long-term methods for coastal
erosion. These adaptations act as wave energy barriers and sediment traps, slowing erosion rates.
Certain characteristics and baseline conditions such as vegetation, geology, geomorphology,
sediment, and differing exposure types are required for living shoreline techniques to reap their
intended benefits. Tools to assess site suitability for living shorelines, available online or through
documents, are critiqued. The critique is based on how well the tool characterizes PEI, signifying
how useful it would be if used as an assessment resource for the suitability of living shorelines.
A multicriteria evaluation was conducted in ArcGIS Pro to identify segments of the shoreline
that were suitable, moderately suitable, and unsuitable for implementing living shorelines. This
model was tested using 31 field sites surveyed between July-August 2021. With this information,
governments and coastal property owners will be able to determine whether or not their property
would benefit from installation of living shorelines. |
en_CA |
dc.description.provenance |
Submitted by Greg Hilliard (greg.hilliard@smu.ca) on 2022-04-29T12:54:44Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
Nelson_Erin_Honours_2022.pdf: 4133880 bytes, checksum: 84ee3232c7304d23c7bc5f9cca9c8670 (MD5) |
en |
dc.description.provenance |
Made available in DSpace on 2022-04-29T12:54:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Nelson_Erin_Honours_2022.pdf: 4133880 bytes, checksum: 84ee3232c7304d23c7bc5f9cca9c8670 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2022-04-24 |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_CA |
dc.publisher |
Halifax, N.S. : Saint Mary's University |
|
dc.title |
Assessing the suitability of living shoreline techniques for coastal erosion in Prince Edward Island, Canada |
en_CA |
dc.type |
Text |
en_CA |
thesis.degree.name |
Bachelor of Science (Honours Geography) |
|
thesis.degree.level |
Undergraduate |
|
thesis.degree.discipline |
Geography and Environmental Studies |
|
thesis.degree.grantor |
Saint Mary's University (Halifax, N.S.) |
|