Abstract:
The aim of this research is to explore how government policies position female entrepreneurs in
Canada in order to understand and positively impact inclusive women entrepreneurship policy
reform in Canada. By using discourse analysis with a post-structuralist feminist theory
theoretical framework, I consider how language is formed in such a way that the discourse of
women’s entrepreneurship, in the context of the Government of Canada women entrepreneurship
policy, is reinforcing traditional gender roles. As a data source, I used the publicly available,
website-based text from the WES Ecosystem Fund as well as the website-based text of the 53
funded programs/agencies of the WES Ecosystem Fund. Three main discourses emerged from
my research. In analyzing the various texts, I conclude that the women entrepreneurship strategy
aligns with the classic liberal feminist approach whereas other branches of the government have
evolved to a more social feminist approach. I suggest that the post structuralist stance has been
critical to developing feminist advancements, which challenge the notion of female essentialism
and assumptions of shared subordination arising from a homogeneous biological identity and
socio-economic positioning. I have shown that the focus on performance and growth ignores
issues on gender equality and gender/power relations even in a country that refers to itself as a
feminist government. My research supports the theoretical finding by other researchers that the
dogged focus on providing entrepreneurship training to women with the hope that more women
will become entrepreneurs is inadvertently creating bigger barriers by “othering” a woman as
someone that needs to be fixed before she can become an entrepreneur. The wording found in the
Women Entrepreneurship Strategy Ecosystem Fund and the corresponding funded programs,
from a post structuralist feminist theory lens, put women in a subordinate position to men and
thereby risk sustaining a male norm.