Dignity at work

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Kelloway, E. Kevin
dc.creator Thibault, Tabatha
dc.date.accessioned 2022-08-11T14:00:48Z
dc.date.available 2022-08-11T14:00:48Z
dc.date.issued 2022-08-02
dc.identifier.uri http://library2.smu.ca/xmlui/handle/01/31003
dc.description 1 online resource (168 pages)
dc.description Includes abstract and appendices.
dc.description Includes bibliographical references (pages 117-130).
dc.description.abstract Workplace dignity has been an emerging topic in psychology in the last decade and is theoretically tied to employee well-being (Khademi et al., 2012; Utriainen & Kyngäs, 2011). However, dignity at work has been difficult to assess due to the lack of a clear definition and the fact that no measure of workplace dignity is available (Lucas et al., 2013). The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a measure of workplace dignity, demonstrate that it is a unique construct, and examine its relationships to pre-established organizational constructs. Based on the current definitions and theorized aspects of dignity at work, a more extensive definition of workplace dignity was offered: Dignity at work involves both self-respect and respect from others, a feeling of worth and value, and a sense of autonomy and control over one’s own behaviour. Study 1 produced a 12-item, four-factor scale where each factor demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency (control; work and value; respect from others; self-respect). Study 2 found that the factor structure roughly held up in a sample of working students and that it predicted employee engagement above and beyond other workplace constructs. Study 3 found that psychological safety longitudinally predicted three of dignity’s dimensions over time (two time lags). Study 4 found that the scale’s factor structure held up over time (three time lags) in a retail sample. Each study examined antecedents (e.g., workload, leadership) and outcomes (e.g., stress) of workplace dignity. Implications for theory and practice are discussed. en_CA
dc.description.provenance Submitted by Greg Hilliard (greg.hilliard@smu.ca) on 2022-08-11T14:00:48Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Thibault_Tabatha_PHD_2022.pdf: 1378681 bytes, checksum: af39a690dde88ee5b92ff9ef505d076c (MD5) en
dc.description.provenance Made available in DSpace on 2022-08-11T14:00:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Thibault_Tabatha_PHD_2022.pdf: 1378681 bytes, checksum: af39a690dde88ee5b92ff9ef505d076c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022-08-02 en
dc.language.iso en en_CA
dc.publisher Halifax, N.S. : Saint Mary's University
dc.subject.lcsh Dignity
dc.subject.lcsh Work -- Psychological aspects
dc.subject.lcsh Quality of work-life
dc.subject.lcsh Well-being
dc.subject.lcsh Leadership
dc.subject.lcsh Psychometrics
dc.title Dignity at work en_CA
dc.title.alternative Dignity at work
dc.type Text en_CA
thesis.degree.name Doctor of Philosophy in Industrial/Organizational Psychology
thesis.degree.level Doctoral
thesis.degree.discipline Psychology
thesis.degree.grantor Saint Mary's University (Halifax, N.S.)
 Find Full text

Files in this item

 
 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account