dc.contributor.advisor |
Kelloway, E. Kevin |
|
dc.creator |
Thibault, Tabatha |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-08-11T14:00:48Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-08-11T14:00:48Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2022-08-02 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://library2.smu.ca/xmlui/handle/01/31003 |
|
dc.description |
1 online resource (168 pages) |
|
dc.description |
Includes abstract and appendices. |
|
dc.description |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 117-130). |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Workplace dignity has been an emerging topic in psychology in the last decade and is theoretically tied to employee well-being (Khademi et al., 2012; Utriainen & Kyngäs, 2011).
However, dignity at work has been difficult to assess due to the lack of a clear definition and the
fact that no measure of workplace dignity is available (Lucas et al., 2013). The purpose of this
study was to develop and validate a measure of workplace dignity, demonstrate that it is a unique
construct, and examine its relationships to pre-established organizational constructs. Based on
the current definitions and theorized aspects of dignity at work, a more extensive definition of
workplace dignity was offered: Dignity at work involves both self-respect and respect from
others, a feeling of worth and value, and a sense of autonomy and control over one’s own
behaviour. Study 1 produced a 12-item, four-factor scale where each factor demonstrated
satisfactory internal consistency (control; work and value; respect from others; self-respect).
Study 2 found that the factor structure roughly held up in a sample of working students and that
it predicted employee engagement above and beyond other workplace constructs. Study 3 found
that psychological safety longitudinally predicted three of dignity’s dimensions over time (two
time lags). Study 4 found that the scale’s factor structure held up over time (three time lags) in a
retail sample. Each study examined antecedents (e.g., workload, leadership) and outcomes (e.g.,
stress) of workplace dignity. Implications for theory and practice are discussed. |
en_CA |
dc.description.provenance |
Submitted by Greg Hilliard (greg.hilliard@smu.ca) on 2022-08-11T14:00:48Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
Thibault_Tabatha_PHD_2022.pdf: 1378681 bytes, checksum: af39a690dde88ee5b92ff9ef505d076c (MD5) |
en |
dc.description.provenance |
Made available in DSpace on 2022-08-11T14:00:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Thibault_Tabatha_PHD_2022.pdf: 1378681 bytes, checksum: af39a690dde88ee5b92ff9ef505d076c (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2022-08-02 |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_CA |
dc.publisher |
Halifax, N.S. : Saint Mary's University |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Dignity |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Work -- Psychological aspects |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Quality of work-life |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Well-being |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Leadership |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Psychometrics |
|
dc.title |
Dignity at work |
en_CA |
dc.title.alternative |
Dignity at work |
|
dc.type |
Text |
en_CA |
thesis.degree.name |
Doctor of Philosophy in Industrial/Organizational Psychology |
|
thesis.degree.level |
Doctoral |
|
thesis.degree.discipline |
Psychology |
|
thesis.degree.grantor |
Saint Mary's University (Halifax, N.S.) |
|