dc.creator |
Tolliver, James M. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-01-10T19:06:29Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-01-10T19:06:29Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2006 |
|
dc.identifier |
http://library2.smu.ca/bitstream/handle/01/25404/asb_proceedings_2006.pdf#page=149 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://library2.smu.ca/xmlui/handle/01/25545 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Student evaluation of teaching instruments (or “SETs”) are used extensively despite considerable resistance from faculty. This resistance is surprising given extensive research which seemingly supports SET use for counselling and evaluation. A reason for this resistance is suggested, arguing that the current debate concerns academic values thus resistance will not be overcome by more or “better” data
. |
en_CA |
dc.description.provenance |
Submitted by Trish Grelot (trish.grelot@smu.ca) on 2014-01-10T19:06:29Z
No. of bitstreams: 0 |
en |
dc.description.provenance |
Made available in DSpace on 2014-01-10T19:06:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0
Previous issue date: 2006 |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_CA |
dc.publisher |
Atlantic Schools of Business |
en_CA |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Universities and colleges -- Faculty |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Student evaluation of teachers |
|
dc.title |
Student evaluation of teaching: a different perspective |
en_CA |
dc.type |
Text |
en_CA |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation |
Proceedings of the Atlantic Schools of Business 36th annual conference, Mount Allison University, September 29th to October 1st, 2006, pp 149-157 |
|