Reactions of powerful CEOs to accusations of illegal activity

dc.creator	Fralich, Russell
dc.creator	Garg, Naina
dc.date.accessioned	2014-02-27T18:42:07Z
dc.date.available	2014-02-27T18:42:07Z
dc.date.issued	2013
dc.identifier	http://library2.smu.ca/bitstream/handle/01/25409/asb_proceedings_2013.pdf#page=252
dc.identifier.uri	http://library2.smu.ca/xmlui/handle/01/25718
dc.description.abstract	We examine how CEOs use power to address public accusations of illegal activity by the firm. Results from a sample of S&P500 firms are consistent with models of cognitive framing and circulation of power, and suggest that powerful CEOs attempt to reduce uncertainty by resolving the accusation, either by accepting a conviction or an out-of-court settlement.	en_CA
dc.description.provenance	Submitted by Trish Grelot (trish.grelot@smu.ca) on 2014-02-27T18:42:07Z No. of bitstreams: 0	en
dc.description.provenance	Made available in DSpace on 2014-02-27T18:42:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2013	en
dc.language.iso	en	en_CA
dc.publisher	Atlantic Schools of Business	en_CA
dc.subject.lcsh	Chief executive officers -- Attitudes
dc.subject.lcsh	Executive power
dc.subject.lcsh	Corporations -- Corrupt practices
dc.subject.lcsh	Commercial crimes
dc.title	Reactions of powerful CEOs to accusations of illegal activity	en_CA
dc.type	Text	en_CA
dcterms.bibliographicCitation	Proceedings of the 43rd Atlantic Schools of Business conference, St. Francis Xavier University, 2013, pp 252-266