dc.creator |
Fullerton, Gordon L. (Gordon Lee), 1964- |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-02-27T18:55:22Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-02-27T18:55:22Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2013 |
|
dc.identifier |
http://library2.smu.ca/bitstream/handle/01/25409/asb_proceedings_2013.pdf#page=301 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://library2.smu.ca/xmlui/handle/01/25721 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Marketing practitioners and academicians have been talking a lot about customer engagement in recent years (Sprott et.al, 2009; Fournier, 2011). By all accounts it is the newest and hottest “construct” in the field these days (Bolton, 2011). But, what is it? Is it a construct in and of itself? Is it a model or set of relationships? Is it some type of second (or third) order factor that subsumes a number of other constructs in the field? Or is it something else? This paper will focus on the “something else” explanation for customer engagement. Specifically, it will put forward that engagement might be little
more than a specific type relationship between commitment and loyalty. |
en_CA |
dc.description.provenance |
Submitted by Trish Grelot (trish.grelot@smu.ca) on 2014-02-27T18:55:22Z
No. of bitstreams: 0 |
en |
dc.description.provenance |
Made available in DSpace on 2014-02-27T18:55:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0
Previous issue date: 2013 |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_CA |
dc.publisher |
Atlantic Schools of Business |
en_CA |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Customer loyalty |
|
dc.title |
Why do committed customers defect? They are not engaged! |
en_CA |
dc.type |
Text |
en_CA |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation |
Proceedings of the 43rd Atlantic Schools of Business conference, St. Francis Xavier University, 2013, pp 301-310 |
|