Abstract:
Professionals have an inherent expectation of autonomy in their work, an associated lack
of respect for both the managerial role and the people who hold managerial positions, and
highly specialized knowledge and skills. These characteristics alone make the
management of professionals difficult. Add to this the fact that there are an increasing
number of professionals being managed by individuals from outside their profession, and
the complexity of the managerial role becomes even greater. It is the purpose of this
dissertation to examine the management of professionals and to determine if a set of
strategies exists that managers can use in order to mitigate the lack of respect that their
subordinates afford them. The dissertation consists of a three-study research design. The
first study consists of interviews of professionals and their managers, looking for
expectations, experiences, and perceptions of managerial effectiveness. A list of
strategies was developed through these interviews. The second study is a large scale
survey conducted over a diverse set of professionals, designed to validate the strategies
and answer questions regarding managers of professionals. The third study consists of a
vignette experiment, with participants rating the effectiveness of managers of varying
levels of expert power and strategies. The research findings indicate that managers who
are members of the profession of their subordinates are more effective than those who are
not. A set of four strategies for managing professionals was identified. These strategies
are used more often by managers who are members of the profession, and are inherent to
professional membership, but are capable of being adopted by managers who are not
members of the profession.