dc.creator |
Powell, Deborah M. |
|
dc.creator |
Jelley, R. Blake |
|
dc.creator |
Goffin, Richard D. |
|
dc.creator |
Heneman, Robert L. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-02-04T20:19:07Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2014-02-04T20:19:07Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2010 |
|
dc.identifier |
http://library2.smu.ca/bitstream/handle/01/25407/asb_proceedings_2010.pdf#page=325 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://library2.smu.ca/xmlui/handle/01/25619 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
We investigated the effects of two manipulations - incentives and rater priming - on performance appraisal accuracy. In contrast with previous studies, our results did not support the hypotheses that priming and incentives would improve Cronbach’s (1955) differential accuracy, a type of accuracy that is most relevant to employee feedback. |
en_CA |
dc.description.provenance |
Submitted by Trish Grelot (trish.grelot@smu.ca) on 2014-02-04T20:19:07Z
No. of bitstreams: 0 |
en |
dc.description.provenance |
Made available in DSpace on 2014-02-04T20:19:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0
Previous issue date: 2010 |
en |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_CA |
dc.publisher |
Atlantic Schools of Business |
en_CA |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Employees -- Rating of |
|
dc.title |
Effects of rater priming and incentives on rating accuracy |
en_CA |
dc.type |
Text |
en_CA |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation |
Proceedings of the 40th Atlantic Schools of Business conference, Saint Mary's University, 2010, pp 325-336 |
|