Tolerating workplace incivility : trade-offs and repercussions of rewarding uncivil high performers

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Kelloway, E. Kevin
dc.creator Crawford, Janet Bell
dc.date.accessioned 2015-10-02T14:36:41Z
dc.date.available 2015-10-02T14:36:41Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.other BJ1533 C73 2015
dc.identifier.uri http://library2.smu.ca/xmlui/handle/01/26362
dc.description x, 185 leaves : ill. ; 29 cm.
dc.description Includes abstract and appendices.
dc.description Includes bibliographical references (leaves 169-185).
dc.description.abstract Studies have illustrated that Workplace Incivility negatively impacts people, productivity and profits yet it persists. Anecdotal evidence suggests that uncivil behaviour from high performers is tolerated thus contributing to the persistence of Workplace Incivility yet empirical evidence is lacking. Using reward as a proxy for tolerance, I conducted three studies to examine; could, does and how does rewarding uncivil high performers happen. In Study One, I utilized vignettes to simulate a 360-performance review. Three variables were manipulated – behaviour (civil, occasionally and consistently uncivil), performance (meets, exceeds and super-exceeds expectations) and instigator’s gender (male and female identified by pronouns). The moderating effects of performance and gender on the incivility-reward (recommendation for reward, bonus, increase salary, high-profile projects, and promotion) relationship were assessed. Results indicated that performance weakened the incivility-reward relationship for promotion only demonstrating that performance lessened the influence of bad behaviour. There was no gender effect. In Study Two, I investigated correlations with employee attitude, workplace incivility, incivility prevention measures, and rewarding civil and uncivil employees. Results indicated that rewarding civil employees contributed to affective commitment, procedural and distributive justice, and incivility prevention while rewarding uncivil employees did not. Intention to quit and workplace incivility were positively correlated with rewarding uncivil employees. In Study Three, I conducted twelve interviews to gain contextual decision-making insights into Workplace Incivility. Most interviewees were unaware of incivility – potentially contributing to the promotion of uncivil high performers – until it was brought to their attention and then they took action by talking to the instigator and engaging Human Resources. This research helped to broaden our understanding of why Workplace Incivility persists en_CA
dc.description.provenance Submitted by Greg Hilliard (greg.hilliard@smu.ca) on 2015-10-02T14:36:41Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Crawford_Janet_PHD_2015.pdf: 1666033 bytes, checksum: a58a92460e1ac629cc32ff6626a33add (MD5) en
dc.description.provenance Made available in DSpace on 2015-10-02T14:36:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Crawford_Janet_PHD_2015.pdf: 1666033 bytes, checksum: a58a92460e1ac629cc32ff6626a33add (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-08-18 en
dc.language.iso en en_CA
dc.publisher Halifax, N.S. : Saint Mary's University
dc.subject.lcc BJ1533
dc.subject.lcsh Courtesy in the workplace
dc.subject.lcsh Work environment -- Psychological aspects
dc.subject.lcsh Work environment -- Social aspects
dc.subject.lcsh Employees -- Attitudes
dc.title Tolerating workplace incivility : trade-offs and repercussions of rewarding uncivil high performers en_CA
dc.type Text en_CA
thesis.degree.name Doctor of Philosophy in Business Administration (Management)
thesis.degree.level Doctoral
thesis.degree.discipline Management
thesis.degree.grantor Saint Mary's University (Halifax, N.S.)
 Find Full text

Files in this item

 
 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record