Abstract:
The most recent Victim Bill of Rights (2015) requires judges to accept and consider VISs during sentencing decisions; however, no regulations exist regarding how these statements
should affect sentencing. Moreover, the lack of research on the impact of VISs creates a gap in understanding whether they have an actual effect on sentencing decisions.
The three separate studies examine VISs from multiple perspectives and angles. These
studies found that stakeholders have differing opinions about VISs. Moreover, an analysis of the
various VIS forms indicates that they differ according to readability, usability, and inclusivity.
Overall, the results of the three studies add to the limited research surrounding Canadian
VISs. The findings also highlighted the uncertainty regarding VIS’s role and the form
procedures.
Description:
1 online resource (ix, 272, 6 unnumbered pages) : illustrations, chart
Includes abstract and appendices.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 178-189).